Use-case assessment
We compare AI with simpler automation, looking at available data, the cost of errors and potential time savings. This informs the decision to build a prototype.
We start with one task: finding information, analysing a document or detecting an anomaly. We build a prototype and measure output quality, task time and running costs. You then decide whether deployment is worthwhile.
We compare AI with simpler automation, looking at available data, the cost of errors and potential time savings. This informs the decision to build a prototype.
We design assistants that use company documents and systems, with attention to answer sources, data permissions and situations that need a human decision.
We assess models for anomaly detection, document classification and forecasting. The approach depends on the problem and available data.
We test answer quality, access controls and resistance to attempts to override model instructions. We monitor costs and errors and define which actions need human approval.
After the workshop, you know which task is worth testing, where the data gaps are and what risks to consider. We may also recommend simpler automation or keeping the current process.
Examples of possible applications and how to assess them. These are illustrative scenarios, not client case studies.
We measure how long the task takes and review how it is done. We agree on a data sample and expected test results.
We build a prototype for the selected task and make it available to an agreed group of users.
We compare quality, time, cost and risks against the agreed baseline.
We agree to deploy, change the approach or stop at this stage.
You receive the test results and our recommendation. You can stop at this stage without commissioning a deployment.
Before starting, we agree which data can be used, who can access it and where the solution will run. We test security within the agreed scope and discuss legal questions with the people responsible for them in your company.